A theory I have posits that to some degree the exaggerations and elite financed promotion of trans and other fringe life choices are to a large extent a strawman and a diversionary divisive tactic to keep us all outraged and occupied whilst the controllers continue with their primary goal ::massive theft of public resources and our freedoms hard-won after centuries of struggle.
There are plenty of different class- and group interests in a symbiotic relationship, all of them feasting on the corpse of Civilization. We are in a terminal phase of decadence, and all kinds of worm and bacteria work together in the dissolution of the body of Civilization. Stealing public resources is certainly a goal of those who can do it (and in a few decades we may well see some very rich former security guards emerging out of bunkers in New Zealand, after they killed their former employers...). Robbing people of freedoms is a means to an end (higher control and exploitation) that, however, is also personal and therefore transitory. They do not have a plan for, say, 200 years; they just want to rule NOW!
Meanwhile, one has some different categories of cannon fodder, from the poor madmen who are right now celebrated as "brave trans" or whatever, to the multitudes of useful idiots in media and academia who believe the Marxian superstitions and drag the whose thing forward. Nobody, however, has a truly long-term plan.
We are, right now, in more or less the same situation as St. Augustine, witnessing the fall of Rome yet unable to know of the Dark Age or the glorious Middle Ages that would follow.
Take for example the modifications being made at the WHO to the IHR ( International Health Regulations). From an objective point of view , the amendments proposed ( and to date unopposed ) have the potential to send us back into serfdom.
Certainly. This kind of thing is one of the many reasons why I am quite happy to live in such a remote corner of the world. The Brazilian government may well wish to impose totalitarianism, but they are just not competent enough to do so. If I lived in what was once called the First World I'd be trying to get out while there was still time.
My view is that there certainly is a long term plan that has been in place for many years , which is for a near complete control of the earth’s population and resources by a small group of dynastic families and bankers, using the intelligence community and the military in this transitional period. The difference now is that these controllers have the real-time ability using big data and AI to impose the technocracy they lust for .
At this point all damages and crimes committed are collateral as far as they are concerned in the frenzied push for a global control system.
Living in a time when few politicians see ahead of a 4-years administration, it can be called "long term". But it doesn't go farther then, say, the grandchildren of those presently in power. Nothing like the much longer game of the Habsburgs, for instance.
Great text! I always find it funny when radical feminists (the ones who oppose the whole gender thing) accuse the "patriarchy" or the "sexist men" of perpetuating this gender madness that is obviously misogynistic at It's core, as you pointed out.
Anyone can perceive immediatelly that the ones who most oppose this movement are heterosexual males, specially the ones deemed to be "right-wing".
I can give you an example: there was an incident at a public university in Brazil on this year, where a "trans women" tried to use the women's bathroom and attacked a girl. People obviously attacked the trans guy for it. To my surprise, there was a demonstration in the university a few days later defending the guy because of the supposed "transphobic" attacks he received. The most surprising thing is: the majority of people in this demonstration were women!
As you can see, even if the one being unjustly attacked by this mad movement is a woman, a lot of women will appear to defend the aggressor against "transphobia". The ones who stand up for the injured women and rightfully push against the crazy bullshit are males (even if they are not that into politics...).
There is nothing surprising in women "caring" for the poor oppressed guy (and trampling over other women to do it) while men protect women against a member of their own sex. The rest is a smokescreen.
Great essay , really hit home with me.
Wow, you're a fast reader. :)
A theory I have posits that to some degree the exaggerations and elite financed promotion of trans and other fringe life choices are to a large extent a strawman and a diversionary divisive tactic to keep us all outraged and occupied whilst the controllers continue with their primary goal ::massive theft of public resources and our freedoms hard-won after centuries of struggle.
More or less. It's true, but it's not everything.
There are plenty of different class- and group interests in a symbiotic relationship, all of them feasting on the corpse of Civilization. We are in a terminal phase of decadence, and all kinds of worm and bacteria work together in the dissolution of the body of Civilization. Stealing public resources is certainly a goal of those who can do it (and in a few decades we may well see some very rich former security guards emerging out of bunkers in New Zealand, after they killed their former employers...). Robbing people of freedoms is a means to an end (higher control and exploitation) that, however, is also personal and therefore transitory. They do not have a plan for, say, 200 years; they just want to rule NOW!
Meanwhile, one has some different categories of cannon fodder, from the poor madmen who are right now celebrated as "brave trans" or whatever, to the multitudes of useful idiots in media and academia who believe the Marxian superstitions and drag the whose thing forward. Nobody, however, has a truly long-term plan.
We are, right now, in more or less the same situation as St. Augustine, witnessing the fall of Rome yet unable to know of the Dark Age or the glorious Middle Ages that would follow.
Take for example the modifications being made at the WHO to the IHR ( International Health Regulations). From an objective point of view , the amendments proposed ( and to date unopposed ) have the potential to send us back into serfdom.
Certainly. This kind of thing is one of the many reasons why I am quite happy to live in such a remote corner of the world. The Brazilian government may well wish to impose totalitarianism, but they are just not competent enough to do so. If I lived in what was once called the First World I'd be trying to get out while there was still time.
My view is that there certainly is a long term plan that has been in place for many years , which is for a near complete control of the earth’s population and resources by a small group of dynastic families and bankers, using the intelligence community and the military in this transitional period. The difference now is that these controllers have the real-time ability using big data and AI to impose the technocracy they lust for .
At this point all damages and crimes committed are collateral as far as they are concerned in the frenzied push for a global control system.
Living in a time when few politicians see ahead of a 4-years administration, it can be called "long term". But it doesn't go farther then, say, the grandchildren of those presently in power. Nothing like the much longer game of the Habsburgs, for instance.
And they lost their timing, anyway. They'll still be able to make the lives of Western Europeans and Anglos hell for a couple of generations, but not much more than that. I wrote about it at https://ramalhete.substack.com/p/the-death-throes-of-globalization
Great text! I always find it funny when radical feminists (the ones who oppose the whole gender thing) accuse the "patriarchy" or the "sexist men" of perpetuating this gender madness that is obviously misogynistic at It's core, as you pointed out.
Anyone can perceive immediatelly that the ones who most oppose this movement are heterosexual males, specially the ones deemed to be "right-wing".
I can give you an example: there was an incident at a public university in Brazil on this year, where a "trans women" tried to use the women's bathroom and attacked a girl. People obviously attacked the trans guy for it. To my surprise, there was a demonstration in the university a few days later defending the guy because of the supposed "transphobic" attacks he received. The most surprising thing is: the majority of people in this demonstration were women!
As you can see, even if the one being unjustly attacked by this mad movement is a woman, a lot of women will appear to defend the aggressor against "transphobia". The ones who stand up for the injured women and rightfully push against the crazy bullshit are males (even if they are not that into politics...).
There is nothing surprising in women "caring" for the poor oppressed guy (and trampling over other women to do it) while men protect women against a member of their own sex. The rest is a smokescreen.